| 
                 
                There are movies that we can't view analytically 
                or objectively. Like a fondly remembered lover, they cannot be 
                cleared from our hearts. I love Blade Runner, what can I say? More than 
                any other movie. So much that I don't even know if it is any 
                good, because I'm blind to such questions. All such objectivity 
                has been lost, "like tears in the rain." I love the way it 
                looks. I love the offbeat supporting characters like Gaff, the 
                cop, and J. F. Sebastien, the genetic engineer. I love the 
                noble, troubled villain and his poetic dialogue. I think it 
                works just fine with or without the voice-over. The director's 
                cut is great, but I also love the original theatrical cut, for 
                reasons similar to the ones voiced below by Scoopy Jr. 
                The story takes place in Los 
                Angeles in 2019. The sun no longer creates daylight because some 
                kind of haze surrounds the city. The sun is still seen as a 
                circular orange ball in the sky, but it only serves to provide 
                the same type of light as moonlight, casting an orange hue over 
                everything. Many humans have left earth to live in colonies on 
                other worlds. The people left on earth are split into two 
                classes of people. The penthouse dwellers live in elegant 
                isolation and never venture into the streets. The streets look 
                like a combination of Hong Kong, Tokyo, and Times Square in 
                the 1980s. 
              Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), one of the few Caucasians on the 
              streets, is trying to enjoy a simple street meal when he is placed 
              under arrest and summoned to police headquarters. It turns out 
              that he's an ex-cop of a very special type - a blade runner - a 
              man whose job is to kill replicants. Replicants are sophisticated 
              androids created to replace humans in certain situations. 
              According to their manufacturer, they are more human than humans. 
              In fact, some replicants are so real that they don't even know 
              that they are replicants because of sophisticated memory implants. Every 
              once in a while they go crazy and turn against humans. Specialists 
              like Deckerd are required to retire them. 
              Deckerd has been called to the police 
              department not as a criminal, but as a forcibly drafted blade 
              runner. He's needed to retire four 
              particularly dangerous replicants who escaped from an off-world 
              colony and, uncharacteristically, returned to earth. The 
              reason for their return? Their leader, Roy Batty (Rutger Hauer), the most sophisticated replicant ever 
              created, has found out that his predetermined shelf life is 
              nearing the expiration date, and he simply wants more life. The 
              only way he might be able to accomplish that is to return to earth 
              and meet with Tyrell, the genius who created him.  
              
              Deckard doesn't want the job of retiring the 
              renegade replicants, but he has no choice, so the hunt is on. 
              
              The dialogue is some of the most poetic in 
              screen history: 
              
                
                  
                  Batty: 
              Morphology? Longevity? Incept dates?  
              Hannnibal Chu: 
              Don't know, I don't know such stuff. I just do eyes, j-j-just 
              eyes... just genetic design, just eyes. You Nexus, huh? I design 
              your eyes.  
              Batty:
              If only you could see, old man, what I have seen with your eyes
                    
                    
              Batty: I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire 
              off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark 
              near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time, 
              like tears in the rain. (NOTE: This beautiful monologue was at 
              least partially improvised by Rutger Hauer.) 
              Tyrell: The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long - and you 
              have burned so very, very brightly, Roy. 
              Gaff (upon seeing Deckard 
              flee Los Angeles with a replicant lover who has an unknown incept 
              date): It's too bad she won't live! But then again, who 
              does? 
              Deckard: All they'd wanted were the same answers the rest of us wanted. 
              Where have I come from? Where am I going? How long have I got? 
              Batty: Fiery the angels fell. 
              Deep thunder roll'd around their shores, burning with the fires of 
              Orc. (NOTE: this one, of course, is real poetry. It is Batty's 
              twist on William Blake's "America: A Prophesy." The original line 
              is, "Fiery the angels rose, and as they rose deep thunder 
              roll'd around their shores: indignant burning with the fires of 
              Orc.") 
                 
              Of the many debates which 
              stimulate Blade Runner geeks, one of the most interesting involves 
              the possibility that Deckerd himself, the ultimate killer of 
              replicants, could be a replicant. In Phil Dick's story ("Do 
              Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?") Deckerd explicitly 
              considered the possibility. If Rachel could be a replicant and not 
              know it, then couldn't any replicant from the same series also be 
              convinced of his own humanity? Deckerd had himself tested by 
              another Blade Runner, and the "Voight-Kampff" test certified his 
              humanity. Director Ridley Scott did not want any such certainty in 
              the film version. He has stated that he wanted to keep the matter 
              ambiguous and, as far as he is concerned, Deckerd probably is a 
              replicant. I fully support Scott's decision to keep it ambiguous. 
              There was nothing in the plot that required a commitment either 
              way, and good art should provoke debate and discussion, as this 
              film has certainly done, if the
              FAQ at IMDb 
              is any indication. 
         | 
    
    
        
           
          Scoopy Junior's 
          notes 
         
          Director's Cut vs. Original 
          Theatrical Cut. This is an old debate so I won't go on too much, 
          but I LIKE the original theatrical release with 
          Harrison Ford doing the voice-over. In my mind, it's kinda the element 
          that makes the movie work. It's the closer. The voice-over is what 
          completes the homage to the classic 1940's style of low-rent detective film noir, which is basically what Blade Runner is 
          structurally. 
              It has been reported that Ford hated 
          the voice-over, and as a result purposely read the lines as poorly as 
          possible thinking that if he did it badly enough, it wouldn't be used. 
          Yet, if you look at the Deckard character, the unkempt, uncaring 
          washout that drinks himself to sleep on the couch ... Ford's contempt 
          for the lines, and "poor" delivery are perfect for the 
              character! Do you think Deckard's 
          inner monologue would be dramatic and expressive? Of course not. It 
          would be a dull monotone. This was a character who was sick of 
          everything, including himself.  
              
              I think it would be a heck of a DVD if BOTH versions were 
          available, with commentary from Ridley Scott and Harrison Ford 
          comparing the two. Especially since Ford and Scott have both been 
          quoted as having different views on the issue of whether Deckard, foremost Blade Runner and the most ferocious killer of replicants, is a replicant 
              himself.  
              
                 | 
    
    
        
           
          Scoop revisits the 5-disk set 
         
 
 
 
 
  
 
Disc One 
RIDLEY SCOTT'S ALL-NEW "FINAL CUT" VERSION OF THE FILM 
Restored and remastered with added & extended scenes, added lines, new and 
cleaner special effects and all new 5.1 Dolby Digital Audio. Also includes:
  
  - 
  Commentary by Ridley Scott  
 
  - 
  Commentary by executive producer/co-screenwriter Hampton Fancher and 
  co-screenwriter David Peoples; producer Michael Deely and production executive 
  Katherine Haber  
 
  - 
  Commentary by visual futurist Syd Mead; production designer Lawrence G. Paull, 
  art director David L. Snyder and special photographic effects supervisors 
  Douglas Trumbull, Richard Yuricich and David Dryer  
 
 
Disc Two 
DOCUMENTARY DANGEROUS DAYS: MAKING BLADE RUNNER 
A feature-length authoritative documentary revealing all the elements that 
shaped this hugely influential cinema landmark. Cast, crew, critics and 
colleagues give a behind-the-scenes, in-depth look at the film -- from its 
literary roots and inception through casting, production, visuals and special 
effects to its controversial legacy and place in Hollywood history.   
Disc Three   
1982 THEATRICAL VERSION 
This is the version that introduced U.S. movie-going audiences to a 
revolutionary film with a new and excitingly provocative vision of the 
near-future. It contains Deckard/Harrison Ford's character narration and has 
Deckard and Rachel's (Sean Young) "happy ending" escape scene.   
1982 INTERNATIONAL VERSION 
Also used on U.S. home video, laserdisc and cable releases up to 1992. This 
version is not rated, and contains some extended action scenes in contrast to 
the Theatrical Version.   
1992 DIRECTOR'S CUT 
The Director's Cut omits Deckard's voiceover narration and removes the "happy 
ending" finale. It adds the famously-controversial "unicorn" sequence, a vision 
that Deckard has which suggests that he, too, may be a replicant.   
Disc Four 
BONUS DISC - "Enhancement Archive": 90 minutes of deleted footage and rare or 
never-before-seen items in featurettes and galleries that cover the film's 
amazing history, production teams, special effects, impact on society, 
promotional trailers, TV spots, and much more.   
  - 
  Featurette "The Electric Dreamer: Remembering Philip K. Dick"
   
 
  - 
  Featurette "Sacrificial Sheep: The Novel vs. The Film"
   
 
  - 
  Philip K. Dick: The Blade Runner Interviews (audio)  
 
  - 
  Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep Cover Gallery (images)
   
 
  - 
  The Art of Blade Runner (image galleries)  
 
  - 
  Featurette "Signs of the Times: Graphic Design"
   
 
  - 
  Featurette "Fashion Forward: Wardrobe & Styling"
   
 
  - 
  Screen Tests: Rachel & Pris  
 
  - 
  Featurette "The Light That Burns: Remembering Jordan Cronenweth"
   
 
  - 
  Unit photography gallery  
 
  - 
  Deleted and alternate scenes  
 
  - 
  1982 promotional featurettes  
 
  - 
  Trailers and TV spots  
 
  - 
  Featurette "Promoting Dystopia: Rendering the Poster Art"
   
 
  - 
  Marketing and merchandise gallery (images)  
 
  - 
  Featurette "Deck-A-Rep: The True Nature of Rick Deckard"
   
 
  - 
  Featurette "--Nexus Generation: Fans & Filmmakers"
   
 
 
Disc Five 
WORKPRINT VERSION 
This rare version of the film is considered by some to be the most radically 
different of all the Blade Runner cuts. It includes an altered opening 
scene, no Deckard narration until the final scenes, no "unicorn" sequence, no 
Deckard/Rachel "happy ending," altered lines between Batty (Rutger Hauer) and 
his creator Tyrell (Joe Turkell), alternate music and much more. Also includes:
 
  - 
  Commentary by Paul M. Sammon, author of Future Noir: The Making of Blade 
  Runner  
 
  - 
  Featurette "All Our Variant Futures: From Workprint to Final Cut"
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Three 
more words: Sean Young topless. 
Yeah, you read that right. 
 
There are three items I found of special interest in those deleted scenes:  
 (1) Deckerd has two long conversations with fellow blade runner Holden, 
who is kept alive in some kind of iron lung after his encounter with Leon.  
 (2) There are a couple of seconds of Joanna Cassidy's butt, almost seen 
through panties which are nearly diaphanous. 
 (3) There is a sex scene between Rachel and Deckerd. It is one of the more romantic sex 
scenes I've ever seen, performed beautifully by both of them to convery the 
desperate longing of the characters, with the 
additional kicker of Sean Young's bare breasts. I wish this had been finished 
off properly and left in the film, but I'm thrilled to see it in any format, 
even if it is raw and unrestored footage. 
             
I've been waiting 25 years to see Rachel the replicant do a nude scene. 
            Thanks, Ridley Scott  | 
    
    
        
                
            
                The
                Critics Vote 
                
                
                
                
                
                 | 
                The People
                Vote ...  
                
                    - IMDB summary. 
                     
                    IMDb voters score it 8.3/10, placing it in the top 100 
                    of all time.
 
                 
                
                    - 
                    It was a failure at the box office. Despite significant 
                    advance publicity and a $28 million dollar budget, Blade 
                    Runner grossed only $28 million domestically. 
 
                 
                Miscellaneous ...  
                
                   | 
             
            
                | The meaning of the IMDb
                score: 7.5 usually indicates a level of
                excellence equivalent to about three and a half stars
                from the critics. 6.0 usually indicates lukewarm
                watchability, comparable to approximately two and a half stars
                from the critics. The fives are generally not
                worthwhile unless they are really your kind of
                material, equivalent to about a two star rating from the critics.
                Films rated below five are generally awful even if you
                like that kind of film - this score is roughly equivalent to  one
                and a half stars from the critics or even less,
                depending on just how far below five the rating
                is. My own
                guideline: A means the movie is so good it
                will appeal to you even if you hate the genre. B means the movie is not
                good enough to win you over if you hate the
                genre, but is good enough to do so if you have an
                open mind about this type of film. C means it will only
                appeal to genre addicts, and has no crossover
                appeal. (C+ means it has no crossover appeal, but 
                will be considered excellent by genre fans, while
                C- indicates that it we found it to 
                be a poor movie although genre addicts find it watchable). D means you'll hate it even if you
                like the genre. E means that you'll hate it even if
                you love the genre. F means that the film is not only
                unappealing across-the-board, but technically
                inept as well. 
                Any film rated C- or better is recommended for 
                fans of that type of film. Any film rated B- or better is 
                recommended for just about anyone. We don't score films below C- 
                that often, because we like movies and we think that most of 
                them have at least a solid niche audience. Now that you know 
                that, you should have serious reservations about any movie below 
                C-. 
                Based on this description, this 
                film is an A. Pretty much universally 
                acclaimed. A gorgeously rendered and imaginative future world, 
                the dialogue of an epic poem, sadness, redemption, intellectual 
                mystery, complex morality, nudity, humor, action, a memorable 
                Vangelis 
                score, and Roy Batty, one of the most complex villains ever 
                brought to the screen. Despite some irritating lapses in logic, 
                it's deserving of its place in the IMDb 
                pantheon. 
                 | 
             
         
         |