Pacific Heights (1990) from Johnny Web (Uncle Scoopy; Greg Wroblewski)

John Schlesinger directed this real estate thriller.

Did that catch your attention? Look at it this way. It's probably the BEST real estate thriller. It's the Schindler's List of real estate thrillers.

Drake (Matthew Modine) and Patty (Melanie Griffith) are an unmarried couple who are looking in San Francisco for their first place to co-habitate. Like many of us, they end up buying a property far beyond their means, a classic from the 1880s, by convincing themselves that it is a wise investment, and that they can make it affordable by renting out two downstairs units. The rental scheme seems reasonable to them, given that the vacancy race in their neighborhood is virtually zero, so they sink all of their life savings into buying the Victorian house and fixing it up, only to end up renting one of the units to a professional scam artist.

Carter Hayes is very familiar with the law, and uses it to his advantage. He finds overextended yuppies, rents from them, then does everything he can to be as annoying as possible. He ducks the rent, makes noises at all hours, scatters roaches through the walls and plumbing, and changes everything that the landlords have tastefully created. He hopes to accomplish one of two things. Either he gets the landlords to overreact in a way he can sue them for, or he simply forces them to miss their financial obligations, either way affording him an opportunity to obtain the property for himself at a price far below its market value.

According to one comment at IMDb:

Pacific Heights is required viewing in all Apartment Management courses in San Diego County. It is a chilling tale of decent but uneducated and unprepared new owners with a dream unknowingly up against a seasoned player in the professional renter game. This viewing requirement is one of the tools used to introduce starry-eyed management newcomers to the harsh and not-so-easily apparent world of the sick, the dangerous and the sue-happy portion of the rental market who will try to get the management stripped of all their personal assets and possessions, fired and possibly jailed.

This is billed as a thriller, but that description only applies to the last ten minutes or so, Before that, it's an annoyance movie. Carter Hayes (Michael Keaton) just keeps getting more and more irritating until we are forced to despise him and root for the yuppies. That isn't as easy to do as it is to conceive, because Matthew Modine's good guy doesn't seem even remotely sympathetic, and his reactions seem so exaggerated and panicky that you may end up rooting for Michael Keaton's bad guy - just because he isn't a complete wuss. The film might have worked better if the script had taken the time to develop the three main characters, allowing the audience to bond with Modine in some way, and allowing Keaton to be a real flesh-and-blood villain, more like a cold-blooded pragmatist and less like a cartoon bad guy. In a rather odd twist in the last fifteen minutes, Keaton switches from merely annoying into full-bore threatening. He grabs himself a nail gun, starts holding it to Melanie Griffith's head, and crosses the line from manipulative to psychotic.

To Keaton's credit, he did what he could with this script and made the film much better by his presence. Given his picky attitude toward projects, however, it's difficult to see what he liked about the role in the first place. I suppose he just wanted a chance to be a bad guy because he did this at the peak of his success, between his two Batman movies.

There's just not much to relate to in this movie. How much can the author expect me to care whether some virtually anonymous yuppies can make an enormous mortgage payment on a $750,000 home? What if they fail? Do they face being cast out into the humiliating world of sub-standard $350,000 housing -  or even (gasp!) an apartment? Will they lose their Starbucks card? Let's face it, this suffering ain't exactly on the same level of empathy as The Pianist.

 

DVD INFO

  • No features except the original trailer
  • the widescreen transfer is anamorphically enhanced, and looks fine

 

NUDITY REPORT

The only nudity comes in the opening credits, from an uncredited Beverly D'Angelo, who shows her breasts and a brief view of her bum.

The Critics Vote ...

The People Vote ...

  • It grossed nearly $30 million.
The meaning of the IMDb score: 7.5 usually indicates a level of excellence equivalent to about three and a half stars from the critics. 6.0 usually indicates lukewarm watchability, comparable to approximately two and a half stars from the critics. The fives are generally not worthwhile unless they are really your kind of material, equivalent to about a two star rating from the critics, or a C- from our system. Films rated below five are generally awful even if you like that kind of film - this score is roughly equivalent to one and a half stars from the critics or a D on our scale. (Possibly even less, depending on just how far below five the rating is.

My own guideline: A means the movie is so good it will appeal to you even if you hate the genre. B means the movie is not good enough to win you over if you hate the genre, but is good enough to do so if you have an open mind about this type of film. C means it will only appeal to genre addicts, and has no crossover appeal. (C+ means it has no crossover appeal, but will be considered excellent by genre fans, while C- indicates that it we found it to be a poor movie although genre addicts find it watchable). D means you'll hate it even if you like the genre. E means that you'll hate it even if you love the genre. F means that the film is not only unappealing across-the-board, but technically inept as well. Any film rated C- or better is recommended for fans of that type of film. Any film rated B- or better is recommended for just about anyone. We don't score films below C- that often, because we like movies and we think that most of them have at least a solid niche audience. Now that you know that, you should have serious reservations about any movie below C-.

Based on this description, it's a C-, a barely adequate thriller that I found far more annoying than thrilling.

Return to the Movie House home page