Teenage Catgirls in Heat

no widescreen version
Full-length writer/director commentary
various DVD extras from Troma, but unrelated to the film

The technical aspects of the film are awful, the acting is equally bad, and the plot is silly at best. On the plus side, there are lots of young women showing their breasts, and some of the girls acting like cats were occasionally entertaining. This was not enough to save the film.

Scoop's comments: I've never seen it and never will see it, but it deserves some kind of award for the title, and Joe Bob Briggs gave it four stars!

And I really miss the old days when the Egyptian Cat Society was in power. They were so much more fun than Republicans.

And had much better haircuts.

The Critics Vote

Rotten Tomatoes summary. Three articles on file.

The People Vote ...

With their votes ... IMDB summary: IMDb voters score it 2.6

IMDb guideline: 7.5 usually indicates a level of excellence, about like three and a half stars from the critics. 6.0 usually indicates lukewarm watchability, about like two and a half stars from the critics. The fives are generally not worthwhile unless they are really your kind of material, about like two stars from the critics. Films under five are generally awful even if you like that kind of film, equivalent to about one and a half stars from the critics or less, depending on just how far below five the rating is.

My own guideline: A means the movie is so good it will appeal to you even if you hate the genre. B means the movie is not good enough to win you over if you hate the genre, but is good enough to do so if you have an open mind about this type of film. C means it will only appeal to genre addicts, and has no crossover appeal. D means you'll hate it even if you like the genre. E means that you'll hate it even if you love the genre. F means that the film is not only unappealing across-the-board, but technically inept as well.

Based on this description, this film is a D+ as a tittie film, and F by any other standard.